DGRW vs QYLD: ETF Comparison
Compare DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception โ one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
DGRW vs QYLD: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, DGRW holds a clear edge over QYLD: +13.1% per year vs +8.6% per year โ a gap of 4.5 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: QYLD currently yields 13.4% vs DGRW's 1.5%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
DGRW vs QYLD Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRW | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | WisdomTree | 5/22/2013 | 13.2y | +410.0% | +13.1% | 1.5% | 0.28% | B |
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.6y | +184.0% | +8.6% | 13.4% | 0.60% | B |
DGRW vs QYLD โ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, DGRW or QYLD?
By average annual total return since inception, DGRW holds a clear edge over QYLD (+13.1% vs +8.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals โ yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between DGRW and QYLD?
DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) is offered by WisdomTree and currently yields 1.5%. QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and yields 13.4%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +13.1% and +8.6% respectively.
Does DGRW pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
DGRW currently yields 1.5% and QYLD yields 13.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance โ total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.