DIVO vs KNG: ETF Comparison
Compare DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
DIVO vs KNG: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, DIVO edges out KNG: +12.7% per year vs +9.1% per year — a gap of 3.6 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: KNG currently yields 8% vs DIVO's 4.8%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
DIVO vs KNG Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVO | Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | Amplify | 12/14/2016 | 9.6y | +217.0% | +12.7% | 4.8% | 0.56% | B |
| KNG | FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | First Trust | 3/26/2018 | 8.4y | +107.0% | +9.1% | 8% | 0.74% | B |
DIVO vs KNG — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, DIVO or KNG?
By average annual total return since inception, DIVO edges out KNG (+12.7% vs +9.1% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between DIVO and KNG?
DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) is offered by Amplify and currently yields 4.8%. KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) is offered by First Trust and yields 8%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +12.7% and +9.1% respectively.
Does DIVO pay a higher dividend than KNG?
DIVO currently yields 4.8% and KNG yields 8%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.