FDVV vs KNG: ETF Comparison
Compare FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
FDVV vs KNG: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, FDVV holds a clear edge over KNG: +13.7% per year vs +9.1% per year — a gap of 4.6 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: KNG currently yields 8% vs FDVV's 2.8%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
FDVV vs KNG Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDVV | Fidelity High Dividend ETF | Fidelity | 9/12/2016 | 9.9y | +255.0% | +13.7% | 2.8% | 0.15% | A |
| KNG | FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | First Trust | 3/26/2018 | 8.4y | +107.0% | +9.1% | 8% | 0.74% | B |
FDVV vs KNG — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, FDVV or KNG?
By average annual total return since inception, FDVV holds a clear edge over KNG (+13.7% vs +9.1% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between FDVV and KNG?
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) is offered by Fidelity and currently yields 2.8%. KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) is offered by First Trust and yields 8%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +13.7% and +9.1% respectively.
Does FDVV pay a higher dividend than KNG?
FDVV currently yields 2.8% and KNG yields 8%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.