FDVV vs QYLD: ETF Comparison
Compare FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
FDVV vs QYLD: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, FDVV holds a clear edge over QYLD: +13.7% per year vs +8.6% per year — a gap of 5.1 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: QYLD currently yields 13.4% vs FDVV's 2.8%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
FDVV vs QYLD Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDVV | Fidelity High Dividend ETF | Fidelity | 9/12/2016 | 9.9y | +255.0% | +13.7% | 2.8% | 0.15% | A |
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.6y | +184.0% | +8.6% | 13.4% | 0.60% | B |
FDVV vs QYLD — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, FDVV or QYLD?
By average annual total return since inception, FDVV holds a clear edge over QYLD (+13.7% vs +8.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between FDVV and QYLD?
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) is offered by Fidelity and currently yields 2.8%. QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and yields 13.4%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +13.7% and +8.6% respectively.
Does FDVV pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
FDVV currently yields 2.8% and QYLD yields 13.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.