GPIQ vs JEPQ: ETF Comparison
Compare GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan NASDAQ Equity Premium Income ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception โ one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
GPIQ vs JEPQ: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, GPIQ decisively outperforms JEPQ: +26.2% per year vs +15.1% per year โ a gap of 11.1 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: JEPQ currently yields 12.8% vs GPIQ's 10.0%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
GPIQ vs JEPQ Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | Goldman Sachs | 10/24/2023 | 2.8y | +91.0% | +26.2% | 10.0% | 0.29% | C |
| JEPQ | JPMorgan NASDAQ Equity Premium Income ETF | JP Morgan | 5/3/2022 | 4.3y | +82.0% | +15.1% | 12.8% | 0.35% | C |
GPIQ vs JEPQ โ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, GPIQ or JEPQ?
By average annual total return since inception, GPIQ decisively outperforms JEPQ (+26.2% vs +15.1% per year). "Better" depends on your goals โ yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between GPIQ and JEPQ?
GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF) is offered by Goldman Sachs and currently yields 10.0%. JEPQ (JPMorgan NASDAQ Equity Premium Income ETF) is offered by JP Morgan and yields 12.8%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +26.2% and +15.1% respectively.
Does GPIQ pay a higher dividend than JEPQ?
GPIQ currently yields 10.0% and JEPQ yields 12.8%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance โ total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.