QQQI vs QYLD: ETF Comparison
Compare QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
QQQI vs QYLD: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, QQQI decisively outperforms QYLD: +17.6% per year vs +8.6% per year — a gap of 9.0 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Keep the track records in mind: QYLD has been trading for 12.6 years, while QQQI has only 2.5 years of history. A shorter track record means the younger fund's average has been shaped by fewer market environments — one strong or weak stretch moves the needle more.
Sponsored by VegaShares
QQQI vs QYLD Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF | NEOS | 1/20/2024 | 2.5y | +51.0% | +17.6% | 14.0% | 0.68% | B |
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.6y | +184.0% | +8.6% | 13.4% | 0.60% | B |
QQQI vs QYLD — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, QQQI or QYLD?
By average annual total return since inception, QQQI decisively outperforms QYLD (+17.6% vs +8.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between QQQI and QYLD?
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF) is offered by NEOS and currently yields 14.0%. QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and yields 13.4%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +17.6% and +8.6% respectively.
Does QQQI pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
QQQI currently yields 14.0% and QYLD yields 13.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.