SCHG vs VFLO: ETF Comparison
Compare SCHG (Schwab U.S. Growth ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception โ one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Oct 31, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
SCHG vs VFLO: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, VFLO decisively outperforms SCHG: +29.0% per year vs +16.1% per year โ a gap of 12.9 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Keep the track records in mind: SCHG has been trading for 16.9 years, while VFLO has only 3.2 years of history. A shorter track record means the younger fund's average has been shaped by fewer market environments โ one strong or weak stretch moves the needle more.
SCHG vs VFLO Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | Schwab U.S. Growth ETF | Schwab | 12/11/2009 | 16.9y | +1141.0% | +16.1% | 0.4% | 0.04% | A |
| VFLO | VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | Victory Shares | 8/7/2023 | 3.2y | +128.0% | +29.0% | 0.8% | 0.39% | B |
SCHG vs VFLO โ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, SCHG or VFLO?
By average annual total return since inception, VFLO decisively outperforms SCHG (+29.0% vs +16.1% per year). "Better" depends on your goals โ yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between SCHG and VFLO?
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Growth ETF) is offered by Schwab and currently yields 0.4%. VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) is offered by Victory Shares and yields 0.8%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +16.1% and +29.0% respectively.
Does VFLO pay a higher dividend than SCHG?
VFLO currently yields 0.8% and SCHG yields 0.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance โ total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.
