DGRO vs VYMI: ETF Comparison
Compare DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
DGRO vs VYMI: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, DGRO narrowly leads VYMI: +12.5% per year vs +11.1% per year — a gap of 1.4 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: VYMI currently yields 4.0% vs DGRO's 2.0%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
DGRO vs VYMI Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRO | iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | iShares | 6/10/2014 | 12.2y | +319.0% | +12.5% | 2.0% | 0.08% | A |
| VYMI | Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 2/25/2016 | 10.4y | +200.0% | +11.1% | 4.0% | 0.07% | B |
DGRO vs VYMI — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, DGRO or VYMI?
By average annual total return since inception, DGRO narrowly leads VYMI (+12.5% vs +11.1% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between DGRO and VYMI?
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is offered by iShares and currently yields 2.0%. VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) is offered by Vanguard and yields 4.0%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +12.5% and +11.1% respectively.
Does DGRO pay a higher dividend than VYMI?
DGRO currently yields 2.0% and VYMI yields 4.0%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.