GPIQ vs SPYI: ETF Comparison
Compare GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
GPIQ vs SPYI: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, GPIQ decisively outperforms SPYI: +26.2% per year vs +14.6% per year — a gap of 11.6 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: SPYI currently yields 11.94% vs GPIQ's 10.0%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
GPIQ vs SPYI Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | Goldman Sachs | 10/24/2023 | 2.8y | +91.0% | +26.2% | 10.0% | 0.29% | C |
| SPYI | NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | NEOS | 8/30/2022 | 3.9y | +71.0% | +14.6% | 11.94% | 0.68% | B |
GPIQ vs SPYI — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, GPIQ or SPYI?
By average annual total return since inception, GPIQ decisively outperforms SPYI (+26.2% vs +14.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between GPIQ and SPYI?
GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF) is offered by Goldman Sachs and currently yields 10.0%. SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) is offered by NEOS and yields 11.94%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +26.2% and +14.6% respectively.
Does GPIQ pay a higher dividend than SPYI?
GPIQ currently yields 10.0% and SPYI yields 11.94%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.