NOBL vs VIG: ETF Comparison
Compare NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
NOBL vs VIG: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, NOBL is virtually tied with VIG — +10.7% vs +10.2%. With a gap this small, the deciding factors are more likely to be yield, payout schedule, and how each strategy fits your goals than raw performance.
Keep the track records in mind: VIG has been trading for 20.3 years, while NOBL has only 12.8 years of history. A shorter track record means the younger fund's average has been shaped by fewer market environments — one strong or weak stretch moves the needle more.
Sponsored by VegaShares
NOBL vs VIG Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOBL | ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | ProShares | 10/9/2013 | 12.8y | +266.0% | +10.7% | 2.1% | 0.35% | B |
| VIG | Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | Vanguard | 4/21/2006 | 20.3y | +617.0% | +10.2% | 1.6% | 0.04% | A |
NOBL vs VIG — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, NOBL or VIG?
By average annual total return since inception, NOBL is virtually tied with VIG (+10.7% vs +10.2% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between NOBL and VIG?
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) is offered by ProShares and currently yields 2.1%. VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) is offered by Vanguard and yields 1.6%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +10.7% and +10.2% respectively.
Does NOBL pay a higher dividend than VIG?
NOBL currently yields 2.1% and VIG yields 1.6%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.