QQQI vs SPYI: ETF Comparison
Compare QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
QQQI vs SPYI: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, QQQI edges out SPYI: +17.6% per year vs +14.6% per year — a gap of 3.0 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: QQQI currently yields 14.0% vs SPYI's 11.94%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
QQQI vs SPYI Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF | NEOS | 1/20/2024 | 2.5y | +51.0% | +17.6% | 14.0% | 0.68% | B |
| SPYI | NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | NEOS | 8/30/2022 | 3.9y | +71.0% | +14.6% | 11.94% | 0.68% | B |
QQQI vs SPYI — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, QQQI or SPYI?
By average annual total return since inception, QQQI edges out SPYI (+17.6% vs +14.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between QQQI and SPYI?
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF) is offered by NEOS and currently yields 14.0%. SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) is offered by NEOS and yields 11.94%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +17.6% and +14.6% respectively.
Does QQQI pay a higher dividend than SPYI?
QQQI currently yields 14.0% and SPYI yields 11.94%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.