QYLD vs VYMI: ETF Comparison
Compare QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
QYLD vs VYMI: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, VYMI edges out QYLD: +11.1% per year vs +8.6% per year — a gap of 2.5 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: QYLD currently yields 13.4% vs VYMI's 4.0%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
QYLD vs VYMI Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.6y | +184.0% | +8.6% | 13.4% | 0.60% | B |
| VYMI | Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 2/25/2016 | 10.4y | +200.0% | +11.1% | 4.0% | 0.07% | B |
QYLD vs VYMI — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, QYLD or VYMI?
By average annual total return since inception, VYMI edges out QYLD (+11.1% vs +8.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between QYLD and VYMI?
QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and currently yields 13.4%. VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) is offered by Vanguard and yields 4.0%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +8.6% and +11.1% respectively.
Does VYMI pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
VYMI currently yields 4.0% and QYLD yields 13.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.