NOBL vs QYLD: ETF Comparison
Compare NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) side by side by average annual total return since inception — one fair number covering price and dividends.
Updated Aug 4, 2026
*For entertainment purposes ONLY! NOT financial advice! Data may be inaccurate.*
Sponsored by VegaShares
NOBL vs QYLD: The Verdict
On average annual total return since inception, NOBL edges out QYLD: +10.7% per year vs +8.6% per year — a gap of 2.0 percentage points annually. Total return counts both price movement and dividends, so this is the whole picture of each fund's performance, not just yield.
Income investors will notice the yield gap: QYLD currently yields 13.4% vs NOBL's 2.1%. Higher yield often comes with trade-offs in price appreciation, which is exactly why total return is the fairer scoreboard.
Sponsored by VegaShares
NOBL vs QYLD Side-by-Side Data
| Symbol | Name | Provider | Inception | Age | Total Return | Avg. Annual Return | Yield | Expense Ratio | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOBL | ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | ProShares | 10/9/2013 | 12.8y | +266.0% | +10.7% | 2.1% | 0.35% | B |
| QYLD | Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | Global X | 12/12/2013 | 12.6y | +184.0% | +8.6% | 13.4% | 0.60% | B |
NOBL vs QYLD — Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, NOBL or QYLD?
By average annual total return since inception, NOBL edges out QYLD (+10.7% vs +8.6% per year). "Better" depends on your goals — yield, payout frequency, and strategy differ between the two funds.
What is the difference between NOBL and QYLD?
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) is offered by ProShares and currently yields 2.1%. QYLD (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF) is offered by Global X and yields 13.4%. Their average annual total returns since inception are +10.7% and +8.6% respectively.
Does NOBL pay a higher dividend than QYLD?
NOBL currently yields 2.1% and QYLD yields 13.4%. Remember that yield alone doesn't capture performance — total return (price + dividends) is the fairer comparison.